• Ahoy and Welcome to the New SSS Forum!!

    As you can see, we have migrated our old forums to new software. All your old posts, threads, attachments, and messages should be here. If you see anything out of place or have any questions, please click Contact Us and leave a note with as much detail as possible.

    You should be able to login with your old credentials. If you have any issues, try resetting your password before clicking the Contact Us link.

    Cheers
    - SSS Technical Infrastructure

New Boat 4 Sled

There you have it, straight from the galley of the comfy Westsail 32 TORTUGA. Warm air rises, filling the mainsail, creating speed and momentum. I doubt Manfred Curry ever considered that. Thanks, Randy! Voting is currently 4 Yays, 3 Nays, and one abstrention. Anyone else willing to chime in? Do you have something more important to do on a stormy, windy, rainy afternoon?

PS, It is currently raining so hard at one SSS Forum's member's home that she is having to bail the overflowing horse watering trough to keep the resident mosquito fish from washing overboard.

The Richmond Yacht Club Race Deck anemometer just blew down? Is nothing sacred these days? Jerry Keefe to the white courtesy phone please.
 
Last edited:
“It seems a bit of a stretch”. But, I vote yes, IF the boat is properly prepared and equipped to do so, and the water conditions are ideal. What is being suggested in the question is not something that would occur everyday. It’s what could possibly occur under ideal conditions. Very few Westsail owners have such occurrences in their priorities. That is the occasion in almost all Westsail observations. Also, although all Westsail 32’s were created equal, not all have matured equally. There are a few around, about 20, that have been “tweaked” under the waterline to enhance performance. “Once moving, weight is your friend in these conditions “. Just my opinion. Thank you
 
Last edited:
No.
Wait a minute. If the TWA is 180 and the TWS is 3, there's no way the AWA can be 48! That would definitely make the answer no. I need to go back and read the question again.
Edit: OK, the true wind is *nearly* dead aft. Some wiggle room there. I'm still saying no.
 
Last edited:
"There are a few around, about 20, that have been “tweaked” under the waterline to enhance performance."

Since PHRF is a performance handicapping system, have these tweaks been declared so these tweaked hulls rate faster than un-tweaked hulls?
.
 
Last edited:
As local denizen Bill Lee would say, "Are we having fun?"

The answer here is affirmative. A walk to the Fossil Cliff last evening overlooked a busy ocean entertaining big swells and a steady breeze of 30-35 knots. As I returned to the CBC, rain began, there was a FROPA passsage, and the wind turned from S to West with a brief 50 knot gust that blew the boatyard gate off its hinges. I sit now typing at the nav station with PG&E power out, using a Group24, 12V battery, an LED light, and 150 watt converter. (A FROPA is weatherman lingo for Frontal Passage.) Hopefully the Richmond/San Rafael Bridge has reopened, as several big rigs blew over.

The current vote on the Westsail conundrum is 5-4, in favor of the Yays with one abstrention. I would note the skipper of the boat in question has checked in with a "Yay," and that his sailing credentials include winning the 1988 Pac Cup, almost winning the SHTP with a broken boom, thousands of ocean miles as a well reputed delivery skipper, and writing the book on turboing Westsails. oregonian knows of what he speaks, and how to make apparent wind work in light winds.

With the power outage, I will delay my report until tomorrow. This allows you to vote, change your vote, and make further comment or question. In addition, below, I attach a photo of the Westsail at the exact time in question and the instrumentation readout. Close examination of the photos may lend further clues for (re)evaluation and possible vector diagrams.

Saraband.JPG

saraBAND2.jpg

And here is the original question to myself from SARABAND's skipper:

"I have a question..... I must first give a few additional details. This involves a photo of Saraband sailing up the coast. Saraband is not stock (but the modifications are YRA approved). The hull has been faired into the rudder and the aperture made much smaller. At the time of the photo the bottom was SORC smooth. The conditions were IDEAL. There may even have been small wavelets from the true wind direction. Here goes: Under such ideal conditions, do you think you could sail a 32 foot boat at 4.2k with an apparent wind of 4.2k with an apparent wind angle of "about" 48 degrees? The boat that took the sailing photo was motoring at 6k but seeing 3k headwind on their anemometer. The instrument photo was taken at the exact same second. I have spent much effort to insure my KM is never reading fast. Do you think that what is portrayed is possible. Thank you"
 
Last edited:
"There are a few around, about 20, that have been “tweaked” under the waterline to enhance performance."

Since PHRF is a performance handicapping system, have these tweaks been declared so these tweaked hulls rate faster than un-tweaked hulls?
.

Yes. When applying for a phrf certificate, we note that the “rudder has been faired to the Hull”. Pictures showing the fairing and aperture were also supplied to the rating committee.
Perhaps that’s why the rating for a Westsail 32 in the Bay Area is lower than anywhere else in the country.
 
Last edited:
My No vote will hold since the the results are only possible under limited conditions. For Saraband, I don’t have additional details, but it is likely those favorable conditions only occurred for an hour ( maybe) before the wave height increased or wind became unsteady.

If the performance could be maintained for a majority of the passage, I would change my response.

My guess is Captain Stange in the PNW could produce similar results. However, it is a special skipper and a well prepared Westsail 32.

But kudos to Saraband!

Ants

PS. As for the storm, the Kern River Valley is generally out of the storm belt, so I took the motorcycle up into the mountains yesterday and said Hello to the clouds and moisture at 6,000 feet and returned home. The first rain arrived this morning.
 
My earlier Yes was based on the information supplied at that time, and any unknown affects of current. With the newly presented data and photo, I question the windspeed. From the surface condition and angle of heel, I suspect there’s more than 3-4 knots of wind. In the photo, it’s notable that the anemometer sender is low on the back of the boat. That’s a great location for DDW sailing to AP, but may be providing questionable AWS data for the 45° apparent wind angle. I suspect there was a little more wind. And as for data from the boat that was motoring, there are too many unknowns to make any sense of it.

None of my comments are meant to detract from what is apparently a great job of preparing and sailing a W32 in light winds. Well done!
 
Thanks to all for participating in our little apparent wind exercise. Much of the fun of this Forum is the sharing of information, even if sometimes contradictory.

Saraband.JPG

What we know for certain about the above photo of a Westsail 32 sailing on a close reach 10 miles north of Grays Harbor, WA, here's what I think:

1. SARABAND is most certainly sailing an honest 4.2 knots through the water. There's a bow wave, she is heeling, the sails and 2 slot effects are working to perfection, and the giant gennaker is pulling like a team of horses. In addition, unseen, the bottom is smooth, fair, and streamlined, which, in my experience, can add a full knot in the conditions pictured. And we know the knotmeter had been calibrated. Apparently this "Wow" moment lasted an hour or so.

2. There's seamanship at work here..DK and I are both advocates of having reef ties rove in place when needed. Nothing worse than trying to hang on while threading the bitter end of a reef tie with one hand through a small grommet without going overboard. Even the staysail has long reef ties, ready to go. In addition, the gennaker halyard is external. No unseen chafe on this vessel, the bane of so many ocean passages. No need to have internal halyards when off the wind. Windage aloft is not always a bad thing.

Look, there's radar. You don't navigate the CA and West Coast on a regular basis without radar. Period. And you don't need the radome way up in the air. 10 feet is fine for getting a reliable 4-8 mile view.

3. Is the true wind really blowing 3 knots? No. It takes 3 knots for wind to break surface tension and wrinkles to begin appearing on the ocean's surface. I not only see wrinkles, but small wind waves. My estimate is the TWS is 4-8 knots. PJ is correct, the wind is never steady either in strength or direction. And heavy boats have momentum and can coast through lulls. In addition, who has ever calibrated their anemometer? Can't be done. At least with any accuracy.

I tried to figure out the TWS of the photo using known vectors of BS, AWA, and AWS, all shown on the cockpit instruments. But came up short. Something wasn't adding up and I believe it is the location of the wind sensor, just above the radome, and smack in the sail plan's back wind when the AWA is forward of abeam. In other words if you tried to sail with your bow on SARABAND's transom, your headsail would be luffing due to the disturbed wind.

Having wind sensors aft and pointing aft is most desirable when running downwind. Less so for sailing nearly close hauled, which SARABAND is doing so very well. SARABAND's skipper has noted he is aware of this backwash effect on the wind sensor and its possible influence on AWA and AWS readings.

Lastly, for those unfamiliar about Westsail ratings, for what it's worth, here is NCPHRF's current database. (The Westsail 32s are listed on pages 59 and 60)
http://www.yra.org/PHRF/docs/current_phrf_certs_rating.pdf

Of five boats listed on current NCPHRF, all SHTP veterans, only PATIENCE shows the "hull faired to rudder" modification. It is possible that other owners declared the modification and NCPHRF ignored them. Checking the current US Sailing PHRF handicaps manual online, NorCal PHRF rates the Westsail at 216, as they did in 2010. Five other PHRF regions, including light air regions like Long Island Sound and S.Cal, rate the Westsail at 204.

Final tally: 4 Yay votes and 7 Nay votes, the Nays indicating they believe the Apparent Windspeed was different, likely stronger, than the readout.
 
Last edited:
Checking the current US Sailing PHRF handicaps manual online, NorCal PHRF rates the Westsail at 216, as they did in 2010. Five other PHRF regions, including light air regions like Long Island Sound and S.Cal, rate the Westsail at 204.

I stand corrected, although I don't understand why S.Cal shows 2 different ratings for the W32 with the same configuration....204 vs 224 all boats without spinnakers, and all with close to the same rated sail area, assuming they all have feathering/folding props which the report doesn't show.
In another low wind area (Pac NW) the W32 rates 242. In the Chesapeake its 246. Go figure!

Thanks for the fun dialogue.
 
One fun number from my notes: The downwind best polars for a Santa Cruz 70 ULDB show that in 4 knots TWS the TWA should be 134, the AWA should be 77, the BS should be 4.0 knots, and your downwind VMG should be 2.8 knots.

One last trivia before we put the Westsail 32 fleet down for a hard earned nap. There is a truly astounding number associated with the Westsail 32. For a quart of Macapuno with organic blueberries on the deck at CBC, what is the allowable length for a Westsail 32 whisker pole in the SHTP, assuming you do not take a penalty by exceeding the 155% jib overlap allowed by NCPHRF.

A. 18.3' B. Longer than a Wilderness 21. C. Longer than the Cal 2-27 DURA MATER. D. Longer than the Hawkfarm 28 EYRIE E. Longer than the O-29 HEDGEHOG. F. Too long to fit aboard the Alerion 38 SURPRISE! between her headstay and backstay. G. 7 feet longer than a stock Santa Cruz-70 spinnaker pole.
 
what is the allowable length for a westsail 32 whisker pole in the shtp, assuming you do not take a penalty by exceeding the 155% jib overlap allowed by ncphrf.

A. 18.3' b. Longer than a wilderness 21. C. Longer than the cal 2-27 dura mater. D. Longer than the hawkfarm 28 eyrie e. Longer than the o-29 hedgehog. F. Too long to fit aboard the alerion 38 surprise! Between her headstay and backstay. G. 7 feet longer than a stock santa cruz-70 spinnaker pole.

g. 24 '
 
A. 18.3 feet

Ants

Based on a stock J of 18 feet. What is 0.3 feet among friends? If the SSSRace committee allows more, I don’t have a clue.
 
My answer, for a pint of Macapuna, is G
28'
I am actually formatting now, on
Page 60 of 170 pages
Waiting on my other editor
 
Philpott is close. Here's the rule, typos included:

3.01 One or more spinnaker poles or whisker poles may be used to pole out headsails. The length of the whisker poles may not exceed the spell out (LP) of the largest rated headsail, and may not be used for setting the spinnaker. [This modifies RRS 50.2]

Since the text instructs us to "spell out" LP, it's spelled L-U-F-F P-E-R-P-E-N-D-I-C-U-L-A-R. It's the rated boat's J length times the "Max Headsail" percentage listed on the boat's certificate. Out of the five WS32's currently listed in the NCPHRF database, Tortuga wins the prize with a LP of a whopping 27.6 feet (J of 18.4 x 150% max headsail). Patience is the pauper with just a 16.7 foot LP. I don't know about Santa Cruz 70s and the like so someone else can (once again) have the ice cream.

s/The Other Editor
 
P.S.: Since Ragtime!'s allowed pole length was 18.6 feet and we could fly twin headsails, my little 30'er had a wingspan of over 37 feet! As written elsewhere, I actually tried this in 2008, taking two telescoping whisker poles of over 18 feet each. I broke one in a big gust but it was fun while it lasted.
 
My answer, for a pint of Macapuna, is G 28'

Philpott wins on her second attempt. NCPHRF allows, without penalty, a 155% of J overlap for a whisker pole length (if you are rated for a 155% headsail) Since most Westsails have a J of 18.3 feet, plus or minus, that lets you have a whisker pole of 18.3 x 1.55 = 28.4'. Which is 7 feet longer than a stock Santa Cruz 70 spinnaker pole! In addition, answer D would have also been correct: "Longer than Hawkfarm 28 EYRIE."

oregonian: does any Westsail 32 you know carry a 28 foot whisker pole? That would be quite a handful for a singlehander. If the same Westsail were carrying twin 155% jibs downwind, that would be a 56 foot wingspan, from pole tip to pole tip. Yikes.
 
Last edited:
I can split hairs for three more days, then I'm retired!

NCPHRF does not limit whisker pole length. In section 10 of its Regulations (X. 3. d.) it says "Whisker pole may be of any length." So go hog wild. But the SHTP rules currently read as quoted above, and are based on the rated boat's dimensions (i.e. not the 155% max headsail allowed under general PHRF reg's).
 
Back to the picture and sea/wind state. On the Beaufort scale (1-3 knots) the description is "Ripples with appearance of scales are formed, without foam crests"
Based on this, I would say Saraband is in these conditions. Here is a picture taken in such conditions.... (not by me) Notice the patches of lighter wind
beaufort 1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top